Livestock Insurance Scheme:
The Livestock Insurance Scheme, a centrally sponsored scheme, which was implemented on a pilot basis during 2005-06 and 2006-07 of the 10th Five Year Plan and 2007-08 of the 11th Five Year Plan in 100 selected districts. The scheme is being implemented on a regular basis from 2008-09 in 100 newly selected districts of the country. Under the scheme, the crossbred and high yielding cattle and buffaloes are being insured at maximum of their current market price. The premium of the insurance is subsidized to the tune of 50%. The entire cost of the subsidy is being borne by the Central Government. The benefit of subsidy is being provided to a maximum of 2 animals per beneficiary for a policy of maximum of three years. The scheme is being implemented in all states except Goa through the State Livestock Development Boards of respective states. The scheme is proposed to be extended to 100 old districts covered during pilot period and more species of livestock including indigenous cattle, yak & mithun.
The Livestock Insurance Scheme has been formulated with the twin objective of providing protection mechanizm to the farmers and cattle rearers against any eventual loss of their animals due to death and to demonstrate the benefit of the insurance of livestock to the people and popularize it with the ultimate goal of attaining qualitative improvement in livestock and their products.
Guidelines for Implementation of Livestock Insurance Scheme:
Livestock Sector is an important sector of national, especially rural economy. The supplemental income derived from rearing of livestock is a great source of support to the farmers facing uncertainties of crop production, apart from providing sustenance to poor and landless farmers.
For promotion of the livestock sector, it has been felt that along with providing more effective steps for disease control and improvement of genetic quality of animals, a mechanism of assured protection to the farmers and cattle rearers needs to be devised against eventual losses of such animals. In this direction, the Government approved a new centrally sponsored scheme on Livestock Insurance which was implemented on pilot basis during the 10th Plan. From 2008-09 onwards, the scheme is being implemented as a regular scheme in the100 newly selected districts till the end of 11th Five Year Plan i.e. 2011-12. The broad guidelines, subject to the plausible discretion of the Chief Executive Officers to be followed by the States for implementing the scheme are detailed below:-
The Principal Secretary/Secretary in-charge Animal Husbandry of the State Governments/Director of State Animal Husbandry Department will ensure availability of sufficient infrastructure in terms of manpower and other logistic support to the CEO/District level officer, needed for effective implementation of the scheme. (The exact name, designation, address of CEO/District Officer in-charge for Insurance work will be made available to Central Government and same will be prominently displayed on important places within the district and especially in the rural areas of the district. Any change in the name and designation of CEO will also be properly communicated to all concerned.). For effective implementation and monitoring of the scheme, if states feel necessity, a district committee could be formed suitably involving the officers/organizations having interest in the field of Animal Husbandry. The Dairy Cooperative Societies, if interested, could also be involved and given responsibility of implementing the scheme wherever possible.
The scheme is to be implemented on regular basis in 100 newly selected districts of the country. The scheme will be restricted to crossbred and high yielding cattle and buffaloes only. The list of districts selected for this purpose is given in Annexure-I. The scheme is to be implemented in these districts only.
In order to get the maximum benefit in terms of competitive premium rates, easier procedures of issue of policy and settlement of claims, Chief Executive Officer will be empowered to decide upon the Insurance company(s) and the terms and conditions. While selecting Insurance Company, besides premium rates offered, their capacity to provide services, terms and conditions and service efficiency should also be taken in to account. The CEO will invite quotations in writing from those public and private general insurance companies having a fairly wide network in the state or a considerable part of the state. The CEO should select the Insurance Company/Companies after negotiating with the insurance companies for successful and efficient implementation of the scheme and popularizing the scheme amongst the livestock owners. If any Insurance Company is offering cover for any type of disability in addition to death of the insured animal, such offer could be considered, however, no subsidy in the premium for such additional risk coverage will be provided. The entire cost of premium on account of the risk coverage other than death of the animal has to be borne by the beneficiaries. As mentioned above, the CEO has to ensure that the premium rate agreed to is competitive. Under no circumstances, the rate of premium should exceed 4.5% for annual policies and 12% for three year policies. Normally, a single insurance company should be entrusted for insurance with the work in a district. However, for the purposes of encouraging competition and popularizing the scheme more than one insurance company may be allowed to operate in a district, if other terms and conditions are remaining same. Default in settlement of claim or any types of deficiency in services on part of Insurance Companies could be brought to the notice of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority which is a nodal authority in the country in this regard.
In order to generate confidence among the cattle owners about the efficacy of the scheme, it is important that the policy cover should take effect once the basic formalities like identification of animal, its examination by the veterinary practitioner, assessment of its value and its tagging along with payment of 50% of the premium to the insurance company or its agent by the cattle owner. The selected insurance company will have to agree to this. However, it is possible that the insurance company may point out a provision in the Insurance Act that insurance cover can take effect only after the whole premium is paid in advance. In order to take care of this problem, there could be an arrangement by which certain amount is paid in advance to the insurance company directly by the CEO. This amount should not exceed 50% of the premium of the number of animals expected to be insured in a period of 3 months. The insurance company, on its part, should issue instructions to their branches that as and when 50% of the premium is paid by the cattle owner, they should issue the policy by suitably adjusting the balance 50% from this advance. The insurance company should prepare monthly statements of the policies issued indicating the assessed value of each animal and the Government share for each district duly countersigned by the district officer of the Animal Husbandry Department and submit to the CEO so that, that much amount can be recouped to the insurance company by the CEO. Target of getting the number of animals insured in a three months period for payment of advance to the Insurance Company should be on realistic basis and recouping of the advance fund should be on the basis of subsequent progress made by the concerned insurance Company.
All those female cattle/buffalo yielding at least 1500 litre of milk per lactation are to be considered high yielding and hence can be insured under the scheme for maximum of their current market value. Animals covered under any other insurance scheme/plan scheme will not be covered under this scheme. Benefit of subsidy is to be restricted to two animals per beneficiary and is to be given for one time insurance of an animal up to a maximum period of three years. The farmers will have to be encouraged to go for a three-year policy which is likely to be more economical and useful for getting the real benefit of insurance on occurrence of natural calamities like flood and drought etc. However, if a livestock owner prefers to have an insurance policy for less than three years period for valid reasons, benefit of the subsidy under the scheme would be available to them also, with the restriction that no subsidy would be available for further extension of the policy. Field performance recorders of the NPCBB could also be involved for identification of beneficiaries. The Gram Panchayats will assist the Insurance Companies in identifying the beneficiaries.
An animal will be insured for the maximum of its current market price. The market price of the animal to be insured will be assessed jointly by the beneficiary, authorized veterinary practitioner and the insurance agent.
The animal insured will have to be properly and uniquely identified at the time of insurance claim. The ear tagging should, therefore, be fool proof as far as possible. The traditional method of ear tagging or the recent technology of fixing microchips could be used at the time of taking the policy. The cost of fixing the identification mark will be borne by the Insurance companies and responsibility of its maintenance will lie on the concerned beneficiaries. The nature and quality of tagging materials will be mutually agreed by the beneficiaries and the Insurance Company. The Veterinary Practitioners may guide the beneficiaries about the need and importance of the tags fixed for settlement of their claim so that they take proper care for maintenance of the tags.
In case of sale of the animal or otherwise transfer of animal from one owner to other, before expiry of the Insurance Policy, the authority of beneficiary for the remaining period of policy will have to be transferred to the new owner. The modalities for transfer of livestock policy and fees and sale deed etc required for transfer, should be decided while entering into contract with the insurance company.
The method of settlement of claim should be very simple and expeditious to avoid unnecessary hardship to the insured. While entering into contract with the insurance company, the procedure to be adopted/documents needed for settlement of claim should be clearly spelt out. In case of claim becoming due, the payment of insured amount should be made within 15 days positively after submission of requisite documents. While insuring the animal, CEOs must ensure that clear cut procedures are put in place for settlement of claims and the required documents are listed and the same is made available to concerned beneficiaries along with the policy documents.
In order to effectively implement the scheme, there is need of strict monitoring at different stages. The monitoring should be in terms of financial releases, number of animals insured and type of insurance. Monitoring at the Central and State levels is extremely important. CEO will be required to make special efforts for effective monitoring. Secretary in-charge Animal Husbandry in State Government/Director of state animal Husbandry will take periodic review of the implementation of the scheme.
The involvement of veterinary officer in the scheme is from beginning to end. His active interest and support is essential for success of the scheme. In view of this it is essential to provide some incentive to the veterinary practitioners to motivate them to carry out these activities wholeheartedly. It has been decided to pay an honorarium of Rs 50/- per animal at the stage of insuring the animal and Rs100/- per animal at the stage of issuing veterinary certificate (including conducting post-mortem, if any) in case of any insurance claim. Central Government will provide the amount needed for payment of honorarium to the S.I.As. The CEOs should ensure that Boards will pay to Veterinary Practitioners at end of each quarter depending on number of animals insured and veterinary certificates issued by them in that quarter.
The scheme is new and people inclusive of the concerned officials are not much aware of the scheme. Therefore, public as well as the machinery involved in this have to be made aware of the scheme and benefits thereof. Pamphlets, posters, wall paintings, radio talks, TV clippings etc. will help in creating awareness among the farmers about the benefits of insuring their high yielding animals under the scheme. Publicity campaigns on special occasions like animal fairs etc. will also be taken up for wide publicity. The Panchayati Raj institutions will be involved in publicity in a big way. The task of disseminating information on the scheme and inviting farmers to offer their animals for identification for insurance will be entrusted to the Intermediate Panchayats. For this purpose the CEOs are empowered to provide assistance not exceeding Rs 5000/- for each intermediate Panchayat (in both cash and in the form of publicity material).
The active and dedicated involvement of insurance agent is most essential for efficient implementation of the scheme. The insurance company should be persuaded to pay at least 15% of the premium amount to the agent out of their premium income. While entering into contract with the Insurance Company, this has to be ensured by the implementing agency.
List of 100 districts covered under Livestock Insurance Scheme during 2008-09 to 2011-12
Sr. No. | Name of the State/District | |
---|---|---|
1 | Andhra Pradesh (8) | |
1 | Khammam *# | |
2 | Anantpur * | |
3 | Adilabad * | |
4 | Kurnool * | |
5 | Nellore * | |
6 | Cuddapah * | |
7 | Mahboobnagar * | |
8 | Warangal * | |
2 | Arunachal Pradesh (2) | |
9 | West Siang | |
10 | East Siang | |
3 | Assam (2) | |
11 | Nagoan | |
12 | Kamrup | |
4 | Bihar (5) | |
13 | Gaya # | |
14 | Bhojpur | |
15 | Nalanda | |
16 | Vaishali | |
17 | Chhapra | |
5 | Chhatisgarh (2) | |
18 | Dhamtari | |
19 | Rajnandgaon # | |
6 | Gujarat (6) | |
20 | Vadodara | |
21 | Junagadh | |
22 | Rajkot | |
23 | Bhavnagar | |
24 | Ahmedabad | |
25 | Katchch | |
7 | Haryana (5) | |
26 | Karnal | |
27 | Faridabad | |
28 | Sirsa | |
29 | Kaithal | |
30 | Sonepat | |
8 | Himachal Pradesh (2) | |
31 | Shimla | |
32 | Hamirpur | |
9 | Jammu & Kashmir (2) | |
33 | Udhampur | |
34 | Anantnag | |
10 | Jharkhand (2) | |
35 | Godda | |
36 | Hazaribagh # | |
11 | Karnataka (4) | |
37 | Belgaum * | |
38 | Gulbarga | |
39 | Mysore | |
40 | Hassan * | |
12 | Kerala (2) | |
41 | Kollam | |
42 | Idduki | |
13 | Madhya Pradesh (6) | |
43 | Sidhi | |
44 | Rewa | |
45 | Balaghat # | |
46 | Sehore | |
47 | Dewas | |
48 | Indore | |
14 | Maharashtra (6) | |
49 | Gondia # | |
50 | Nagpur | |
51 | Bhandara | |
52 | Yavatmal * | |
53 | Jalna | |
54 | Wardha | |
15 | Manipur (2) | |
55 | Thoubal | |
56 | West Imphal | |
16 | Meghalaya (2) | |
57 | West Garo Hills | |
58 | Jaintia Hills | |
17 | Mizoram (2) | |
59 | Saiha | |
60 | Kolasib | |
18 | Nagaland (2) | |
61 | Kohima | |
62 | Wokha | |
19 | Orissa (2) | |
63 | Puri | |
64 | Sambalpur # | |
20 | Punjab (6) | |
65 | Gurdaspur | |
66 | Jalandhar | |
67 | Hoshiarpur | |
68 | Bathinda | |
69 | Moga | |
70 | Mansa | |
21 | Rajasthan (6) | |
71 | Chittorgarh | |
72 | Nagaur | |
73 | Bhilwara | |
74 | Jodhpur | |
75 | Bikaner | |
76 | Sri Ganganagar | |
22 | Sikkim (2) | |
77 | West Sikkim | |
78 | North Sikkim | |
23 | Tamilnadu (5) | |
79 | Villupuram | |
80 | Tirunelveli | |
81 | Thirucharapalli | |
82 | Dharmapuri | |
83 | Thiruvannamalai | |
24 | Tripura (1) | |
84 | South Tripura | |
25 | Uttar Pradesh (12) | |
85 | Mathura | |
86 | Deoria | |
87 | Jaunpur | |
88 | Sitapur | |
89 | Sultanpur | |
90 | Hardoi | |
91 | Gonda | |
92 | Kheri | |
93 | Bijnor | |
94 | Ghazipur | |
95 | Raebareli | |
96 | Sonebhadra # | |
26 | Uttarakhand (2) | |
97 | Dehradun | |
98 | Nainital | |
27 | West Bengal (2) | |
99 | Hooghly | |
100 | Jalpaiguri |
* Suicide prone districts
# LWE Districts